Social networking, I believe, is a tool which can be used to augment other forms of written and spoken communication (face to face communication [which I hear is largely body language], article publication, email, telephone conversations, blogs, etc).As in other forms of communication, the content may be perceived by the receiver as beneficial or hurtful. Social networking has the potential of reaching a wider and more diverse “audience” than other forms of communication. This is because one chooses friends based on different facets of one’s life. So, it behooves (sorry it’s early AM!) one
to keep an audience in mind, and write and select friends and other items on one’s website accordingly. And one would be wise to read other websites with a bit of compassion, and not rush to judgment.
Social network websites are in different stages of development. However, they register on my brain overwhelmingly as static. So, I have to keep reminding myself they are works in progress and the views, friends chosen, etc do not reflect 100% of the person,
institution (as a library), group, etc.
My experience with Facebook
I liked the many different options [including editing] but overall found individual Web sites to be overwhelming…and perceived as clutter…but that happens to me with quite a few subscription databases from reputable publishers in the biomedical field.
To be honest, I wonder if I would have time to keep my Facebook page current, and wonder if what I post is reflective of what I want to share. ..and if what I wantto share is of value.
Should your library have a Facebook or MySpace page?
I think this is something the reference librarians should decide as a group.Two of our librarians are 27, the other 3 including me, are 40+. This is good…different ages and also different experiences.
My gut instinct says no to Facebook/MySpace. I tend to agree with a finding in Libraries and Social Networking. The authors state that both the general public and US library directors believe the library is for learning/information and do not see the connection with social networking and libraries.
However, this may change, with current trends, including information commonsareas in academic libraries. And a few libraries have started with using these websites as places to have library related activities…some traditional, some new (as making comments, signing up for RSS feeds (as holds/checkouts), interactive art, del.icio.us tags for additional links to library catalog, instructional/informative videos, library related advice, promoted events ).
So, the question is how much does a library lead or follow? Personally, I haven’t come to terms with that.However, if a decision has a sound base, progress will be made, even if the library “changes its mind”, I think. Sound base would include patron info seeking habits and their use and perception of social networking Web sites.
Are there privacy concerns for individuals when using social networking sites?
Yes, anytime one publishes online with any personal information (even if one’s name is not included); there is the potential that the information may be used wrongfully by others or it may come back in ways unintended. Adults targeting children, bullying, job interviews (so, what else went on in that party?) and the shunning of a person due to political/religious views come to mind.
Friends by invitation only and mindful postings can address and resolve many privacy related issues. However, no combination of actions will be 100% effective. Curiosity, fear, and other human emotions are potentially very strong motivators.
How can social networking be used by MLA to connect members?
It could be used as a meeting place to discuss issues; place to share what works/doesn’t work in one’s library; networking hub to work with colleagues facing similar challenges and similar projects; place to work together on implementing objectives of MLA.
